KURIKULUM CINTA DALAM PENDIDIKAN ANAK: REKONSEPTUALISASI PENDIDIKAN BERBASIS WELAS ASIH, ETIKA, DAN PENGEMBANGAN KEMANUSIAAN

Authors

  • Nazhifatul Ulfah STIT Muhammadiyah Kediri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46773/cxh9s685

Keywords:

curriculum theory; compassion; ethics in education; human flourishing; human education

Abstract

Global education systems are increasingly confronted with processes of dehumanization driven by the dominance of instrumental rationality, market-oriented curricula, and the prioritization of cognitive efficiency over ethical and affective development. The strongest foundation for developing ethical and affective values is established in early childhood, serving as a basis for character formation that supports all learning processes and life in later adulthood. This article advances the concept of Curriculum of Love as a critical reconceptualization of curriculum theory that re-centers compassion, ethical responsibility, and human flourishing as foundational educational principles. Employing a qualitative conceptual methodology grounded in critical literature analysis, this study engages with humanistic education, moral philosophy, and contemporary curriculum discourse to interrogate the limitations of technocratic educational paradigms. The analysis reveals that the Curriculum of Love constitutes a normative–ethical framework capable of integrating cognitive, moral, and relational dimensions of learning within a holistic educational vision. By emphasizing compassionate pedagogical relationships, ethical reflexivity, and the cultivation of shared humanity, this approach challenges reductionist models of education and offers a transformative alternative for addressing global crises such as social fragmentation, intolerance, and moral disengagement. This article contributes theoretically to international curriculum studies by positioning love and compassion not as peripheral values, but as epistemological and ethical foundations of sustainable and humane education.

References

Apple, M. W., Apple, M. W., Emeritus, J. B., & Studies, E. P. (2018). Ideology and Curriculum. Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429400384

Biesta, G. (2019). What Kind of Society Does the School Need? Redefining the Democratic Work of Education in Impatient Times. Stud Philos Educ, 38, 657–668. Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09675-y

Biesta, G. J. J. (2015). Good Education in an Age of Measurement (1st Editio). New York. Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634319

Freire, P. (2024). Teaching Pedagogy of the Oppressed. The Student Guide to Freire’s’ Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 173.

Giroux, H. A. (2022). Pedagogy of Resistance.

Hooks, B. (2014). Teaching To Transgress (1st Editio). New York. Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203700280

Kristjánsson, K. (2019). Flourishing as the Aim of Education (1st Editio). London. Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429464898

Noddings, N. (2018). Philosophy of Education (4th Editio). New York. Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494864

OECD. (2019). An OECD learning framework 2030. The future of education and labor, 23–35.

Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.

UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. Comparative Education, 58(4), 186. Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2022.2102326

Zembylas, M. (2018). Reinventing critical pedagogy as decolonizing pedagogy: The education of empathy. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 40(5), 404–421.

Zembylas, M. (2020). The affective grounding of post-truth: pedagogical risks and transformative possibilities in countering post-truth claims. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 28(1).

Downloads

Published

2026-02-06

Issue

Section

Articles