LITERATUR REVIEW: ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN SHARED METACOGNITION SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46773/2j4aq733Abstract
Metacognitive ability plays an essential role in mathematical problem solving as it enables students to consciously plan, monitor, and evaluate their thinking processes. Along with the development of collaborative learning, metacognition has expanded beyond the individual domain to include a social dimension known as shared metacognition. This study aims to systematically examine the concepts, indicators, and research findings related to students’ shared metacognition in solving mathematical problems. This research employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method guided by the PRISMA framework. Relevant articles were collected from national and international databases, selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and analyzed thematically. The results indicate that shared metacognition plays a strategic role in enhancing the quality of mathematical problem solving through collective planning, monitoring, and evaluation processes. High-achieving students tend to demonstrate more complete metacognitive profiles, whereas students with moderate and low abilities experience difficulties, particularly at the evaluation stage. In addition, the role of expert students and the implementation of collaborative learning models such as Cooperative Script and Hybrid Project-Based Learning have been shown to support the development of shared metacognition. These findings highlight the importance of integrating shared metacognition into mathematics learning to foster students’ higher-order thinking skills.
Keywords: shared metacognition; mathematical problem solving; collaborative learning; metacognition; HOTS
References
-Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Fitriyani, N., et al. (2022). Metacognitive-based learning and students’ mathematical thinking skills. Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.13.2.16261
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). The role of shared metacognition in a community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.01.002
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876428
Hidayat, W., et al. (2021). Cooperative script learning model and students’ metacognitive ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764, 012062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012062
Järvelä, S., Hadwin, A. F., Malmberg, J., & Miller, M. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1075408
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134500
Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538731
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurazisah Rahman, Aisyah Nursyam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
