THE EFFECT OF LEARNING STYLES ON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS' SPATIAL REASONING IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRY

Authors

  • FATUS ATHO'UL MALIK INSTITUT ALIF MUHAMMAD IMAM SYAFI'I

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46773/j8wh8089

Abstract

Spatial reasoning ability is crucial in mathematics learning, particularly in three-dimensional geometry. However, its development faces various obstacles, including limited instructional media and teaching approaches that do not accommodate students' learning style diversity. This study aimed to examine the effect of learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) on junior high school students' spatial reasoning abilities. A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design was employed, involving 30 ninth-grade students from SMP Bustanul Hikmah Lamongan. Quantitative data were collected through learning style questionnaires and spatial reasoning tests covering spatial perception, spatial visualization, and spatial rotation. Qualitative data were obtained through observations and in-depth interviews with three selected subjects representing each learning style. Quantitative analysis using One-Way ANOVA revealed significant differences in spatial reasoning abilities based on learning styles . Kinesthetic students demonstrated the highest average scores, followed by visual and auditory students. Post Hoc Bonferroni tests indicated that both kinesthetic and visual learning styles were significantly more effective than auditory styles. Qualitative findings revealed distinct characteristics: auditory students relied on internal verbalization and struggled with complex visualizatio, visual students created detailed visual representations but were limited in dynamic transformations, kinesthetic students integrated physical gesture simulation with adaptive strategy flexibility. These findings suggest that geometry instruction should accommodate learning style diversity through varied instructional modalities, appropriate scaffolding, and compensatory strategy training. The use of technology such as virtual manipulatives, 3D animations, and augmented reality is recommended to optimize spatial reasoning development across all learning styles.

References

Awado, T. M., Abalos, T. J., Pelago, H. R., Morales, V., Torres, J. G., Milano, M. L., Hallarte, D. K., Gonzales, R., & Gonzales, G. (2024). Impact of teaching style on perceived mathematics achievement of elementary education preservice teachers: the mediating roles of attitude and math self-concept. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00388-0

Ayuningrum, L., Kusuma, A. P., & Rahmawati, N. K. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Pemahaman Belajar serta Penyelesaian Masalah Ruang Dimensi Tiga. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 5(1), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v5i1.5277

Basiran, Ab., Supriadi, S., & Suroyo, S. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik Berbantuan Alat Peraga Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Geometri Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Visual Spasial Siswa SD Kelas V Di Kecamatan Pasar Kemis Kabupaten Tangerang. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 5(2), 1148–1154.

Creswell, John W Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.

Danişman, Ş., & Erginer, E. (2017). The predictive power of fifth graders’ learning styles on their mathematical reasoning and spatial ability. Cogent Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1266830

Febrianti, D. A., Emmanuela, E., Tambunan, B., Tarigan, G. H., Lestari, J. A., Tampubolon, S. T. V., & Siregar, B. H. (2024). Peningkatan Kemampuan Spasial Siswa SMP Negeri 17 Kelas IX Melalui Penerapan RME Berbantuan Media Interaktif GeoGebra pada Materi Transformasi Geometri. JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matemaika Dan IPA, 4(3), 553–561.

Fitriyah, H., & Putri, A. D. (2024). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Materi Geometri Pada Siswa Kelas 4 Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.58917/ijme.v2i2.64

Gómez-Tone, H. C., Martin-Gutierrez, J., Bustamante-Escapa, J., & Bustamante-Escapa, P. (2021). Spatial skills and perceptions of space: Representing 2D drawings as 3D drawings inside immersive virtual reality. Applied Sciences, 11(4), 1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041475

Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice.". Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260

Lokollo, L. J., Lasaiba, M. A., Arfa, A. M., & Lasaiba, D. (2024). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Spasial Melalui Pendidikan STEM di Sekolah Dasar. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 14(3), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.47134/ppm.v2i1.1112

Lowrie, T., & Diezmann, C. M. (2007). Solving Graphics Problems: Student Performance in Junior Grades TOM. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(6), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.6.369-378

Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Hegarty, M. (2019). The Influence of Spatial Visualization Training on Students’ Spatial Reasoning and Mathematics Performance. Journal of Cognition and Development, 20(5), 729–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2019.1653298

Maftuh, M. S., & Alisya, T. N. (2023). Level Kemampuan Penalaran Spasial Siswa SMA dengan Gaya Belajar Visual dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Geometri. MENDIDIK: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 9(2), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.30653/003.202392.16

Maftuh, M. S., & Ni’mah, A. W. (2023). Level Kemampuan Penalaran Spasial Siswa SMA dengan Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Geometri. Jurnal Simki Pedagogia, 6(1), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.29407/jsp.v6i2.250

Mahadi, F., Husin, M. R., & Md, H. N. (2022). Gaya Pembelajaran: Visual, Auditori dan Kinestetik. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.jhass-0401.340

Milles, M. B., & Hubermen, A. M. (1994). Qualitative and Analysis (2nd Ed). UI Press.

Oktavianto, D. A. (2022). Pengaruh Project-Based Learning Berdiferensiasi dengan Aktivitas Inkuiri Geografis Terhadap Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Spasial Siswa. Jurnal TEKNODIK, 26(2), 145–156. https://jurnalteknodik.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/jurnalteknodik/article/view/1015/515

Osman, N. W., Wan Salleh, W. M. N. H., & Taha, H. (2024). Kajian Korelasi Gaya Pembelajaran Visual, Auditori, dan Kinestetik Terhadap Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) Pelajar dalam Topik Respirasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 14(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol14.1.3.2024

Ramful, A., Lowrie, T., & Logan, T. (2017). Measurement of Spatial Ability: Construction and Validation of the Spatial Reasoning Instrument for Middle School Students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(7), 709–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916659207

Riyanto, O. R., Widyastuti, Yustitia, V., Oktaviyanthi, R., Sari, N. H. M., Izzati, N., Sukmaangara, B., Indartiningsih, D., Wibowo, A., Maharbid, D. A., & Wahid, S. (2024). Kemampuan Matematis (Issue July). CV. Zenius Publisher.

Septian, A., Fahrisyal, M. L., & Jusniani, N. (2022). Pengembangan GeoGebra Classroom Pada Materi Transformasi Geometri. Prisma, 11(2), 504–514. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v11i2.2483

Sheromova, T. S., Khuziakhmetov, A. N., Kazinets, V. A., Sizova, Z. M., Buslaev, S. I., & Borodianskaia, E. A. (2020). Learning styles and development of cognitive skills in mathematics learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(11). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8538

Silaban, R. A., Ilahi, A., Effendi, Sari, N., Truelovin H.P, R., Syarifah, H., AlIkhlas, Amrullah, A. K., Ningsih, R. W., Setyorini, I., Rodin, R., Ratih Permana Sari, Hilyana, F. S., Effendi, H., Sobirin, M. A., & Sinaga, D. (2024). Gaya Belajar Peserta Didik. Penerbit Mifandi Mandiri Digital.

Sugianto, A. (2021). Kuesioner Gaya Belajar Siswa. Repo-Dosen.Ulm.Ac.Id, 1–6. https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/26041/Angket Gaya Belajar 2021.pdf?sequence=1

Xie, F., Zhang, L., Chen, X., & Xin, Z. (2020). Is Spatial Ability Related to Mathematical Ability: a Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 113–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09496-y

Downloads

Published

2026-01-20

Issue

Section

Articles