PENGUATAN CINTA AKSARA DAN BAHASA SUNDA MELALUI PROGRAM 40 HARI MENCINTAI KEARIFAN LOKAL DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46773/djce.v4i3.2545Abstract
The Community Service Program (KKN) at Kertayasa 2 Elementary School in Sindangagung District aimed to foster students' love of Sundanese script and language through a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach. The initiative stemmed from the declining interest of young people in regional languages due to the dominance of national and global languages. The research method used was qualitative, with data collection techniques including observation, interviews, and documentation of activities over a 40-day period. CLIL was implemented by integrating local wisdom into the learning process, enabling students to not only learn Sundanese linguistically but also understand its cultural values. The results showed that students were more enthusiastic about participating in the learning process, were able to write basic Sundanese script correctly, and were confident in using Sundanese in everyday communication within the school environment. Furthermore, teachers gained new experience in integrating content-based learning strategies with a linguistic approach, which resulted in increased variety in teaching methods. Overall, CLIL implementation has proven effective in increasing students' appreciation of Sundanese
References
Alwasilah, A. C. (2012). Pokoknya kualitatif: Dasar-dasar merancang dan melakukan penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Kiblat Buku Utama.
Beverley, B. (1993). Children’s Science, Constructivism and Learning in Science (Second Edition). Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Bruton, J. (2021). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Creating natural learning environments. Journal of Language Education, 12(3), 45–58.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
Colliver, Y. (2018). Fostering young children’s interest in numeracy through demonstration of its value: The footsteps study. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(4), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0216-4
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Fathurrohman, P. (2015). Budaya organisasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
García-Pinar, A. (2020). Teacher scaffolding in CLIL classrooms: A ZPD perspective. International Journal of Bilingual Education, 8(2), 101–117.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
Holliday, A. (2016). Doing and writing qualitative research. London: Sage.
Huda, M. (2017). Model-model pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Kemendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud Nomor 65 Tahun 2013 tentang standar proses pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
Lasagabaster, D., & López, A. (2022). CLIL and self-efficacy development in young learners. Language Teaching Research, 26(5), 987–1005.
Lestari, R. (2022). Revitalisasi aksara Sunda dalam pendidikan formal. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Daerah, 14(1), 33–49.
Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.4.319
López, M., & Martín, P. (2020). Collaborative interaction in CLIL primary classrooms. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 211–230.
Lynch, B. K. (1996). Language program evaluation: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Boston: Pearson Higher Education.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Morton, T. (2021). Managing cognitive load in CLIL classrooms: Challenges and strategies. Language and Education, 35(4), 367–382.
Navés, T. (2021). Dual coding and CLIL: The role of visualization in language learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 145–162.
Nuryani, S. (2020). Motivasi siswa dalam pembelajaran muatan lokal bahasa daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 22(3), 201–215.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Perez-Cañado, M. L. (2020). Teacher preparedness in CLIL: Pedagogical and methodological implications. International CLIL Journal, 9(1), 23–39.
Putri, A., & Nugraha, Y. (2021). Literasi budaya lokal sebagai penguatan identitas siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 11(2), 56–68.
Rahmawati, I., & Syamsuddin, A. (2021). Fenomena pergeseran bahasa daerah di kalangan pelajar. Jurnal Sosiolinguistik, 9(1), 77–90.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Smith, J., & Brown, K. (2019). CLIL and learner motivation: Evidence from primary education. International Journal of Language Studies, 13(2), 201–218.
Smith, J., & Brown, K. (2020). Integrating culture in CLIL: A contextual approach to language learning. Journal of Bilingual Education, 15(4), 355–370.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–484). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Syah, M. (2013). Psikologi pendidikan dengan pendekatan baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
UNESCO. (2020). World report on endangered languages. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wahyudi, D., & Wulandari, N. (2020). Penerapan CLIL pada sekolah dasar: Sebuah studi kasus. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 8(2), 120–132.
Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Widodo, H. (2021). Bahasa dan budaya dalam pembelajaran CLIL. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 17(3), 88–101.
Widodo, H. P. (2016). Language policy in practice: Reframing English language education in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Journal, 70(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv069
Wijayanti, T. (2020). Integrasi kearifan lokal dalam pembelajaran sekolah dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 6(1), 13–25.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ade Aspandi, Annisa Fauziah Rahmah, Suci Tri Fuji Astuti, ardhian sahrul rhomadon, Miranda Nurfadillah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
