DISPARITAS PUTUSAN TENTANG IZIN POLIGAMI ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN PUTUSAN HORIZONTAL DI PENGADILAN AGAMA BANDUNG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46773/sv7q3v22Abstract
This study is motivated by the existence of judicial disparity in polygamy permit cases, particularly in Decision Number 3107/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Badg and Decision Number 3144/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Badg, despite having relatively similar grounds for application. This research aims to analyze the judges’ legal reasoning in both decisions, identify the juridical factors causing the disparity, and examine them from the perspective of Islamic family law and Indonesian positive law. The method used is normative legal research with a qualitative approach he method used is normative legal research with a qualitative approach using the analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. The results show that the disparity is caused by differences in the interpretation of Article 4 paragraph (2) and Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974, differences in the position of the Compilation of Islamic Law in judicial reasoning, and the absence of clear guidelines regarding the recognition of reasons beyond normative provisions. The first decision applies a limitative approach, resulting in the application being declared inadmissible, while the second decision adopts a non-limitative approach by considering public interest (maslahah) and the prevention of adultery, leading to the approval of the application. This disparity reflects the tension between normative and contextual approaches in religious court practices, which ultimately affects legal certainty and consistency in judicial decisions.
References
Ahmad, J. (2018). Desain Penelitian Analisis Isi (Content Analysis) Desain Penelitian Analisis Isi ( Content Analysis). Jurnal Analisis Isi.
‘Amala, A. A. A., Hidayat, A. R. H., Liberte, I. A., & Jundi, M. (2025). Poligami Dalam Timbangan Maqashid Syariah Dan Hukum Undang-Undang Di Indonesia. AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584), 5(2), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.37680/almikraj.v5i2.6722
Arifia, M. U., Gultom, B. M., & Markoni. (2023). Upaya Meminimalisir Disparitas Putusan Hakim. Jurnal Transformasi Sintaksis.
Arsadani, Q., Djamil, F., Jahar, A. S., & Sholeh, M. A. N. (2025). Pertimbangan Hakim Menolak Perkara Izin Poligami (Studi Putusan di Pengadilan Agama Makassar Kelas IA Perkara Nomor 455/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Mks). Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 24(1), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v24i1.37775
Chandra Sukma, R., & Agustanti, R. D. (2023). Disparitas Putusan Hakim Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ujara Kebencianyang Dilakukan Masyarakat Umum. Jurnal Esensi Hukum, 5(1), 1–15. https://journal.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/esensihukum/index
Damarsari, B. P., Handoko, W., & Lumbanraja, A. D. (2021). Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Hukum Progresif Terhadap Pandangan Hakim Pada Hak Anak Hasil Poligami Tanpa Izin. Notarius, 14(1), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i1.38862
Fiqih, P. R., & Cholil, M. (2025). Ration Deciden di Pengadilan Agama Terhadap Permohonan Izin Poligami (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Sidoarjo Nomor 1671/PDT.G/2022/PA.SDA). Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis.
Hasanuddin, A., Basri, R., & Said, Z. (2025). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Pembatalan Perkawinan dengan Alsan Poligami (Studi Putusan di Pengadilan Agama Makassar). Al-Hukamaa Jurnal Hukum Keluarga ISLAM.
Isfahani, H. (2025). TINJAUAN MAQĀṢID SYARĪʻAH TERHADAP PEMBERIAN IZIN POLIGAMI DISEBABKAN ISTRI SAKIT (Studi Putusan Nomor 513/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Btg). 2.
Khalid, A. (2014). Penafsirah Hukum Oleh Hakim dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. Al’ Adl, VI(11), 10.
Korinendi, A., Bahri, A., & Irfansyah. (2024). Asas Monogami dalam Perkawinan Berdasarkan Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam. https://www.ejournal.stai-mifda.ac.id/index.php/jmkhi/article/view/1447/331
Marilang. (2017). Menimbang Paradigma Keadilan Hukum Progresif Considering The Progressive Legal Justice Paradigm. Jurnal Konstitusi. http://www.hukumonline.com,
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum . Mataram University Press.
Muhyiddin. (2023). Studi Pertimbangan Hukum Terhadap Putusan Hakim dalam Perkara Permohonan Izin Poligami pada Perkara Nomor 28/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Ek. Repository IAIN ParePare, 85–86.
Mukri, M. (2018). Poligami: Antara Teks dan Konteks Sosial. Al-’Adalah.
Nuruddin, A., & Tarigan, A. A. (2019). Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia Studi Kritis Perkembangan Hukum Islam dari Fikih, Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Sampai Kompilasi Hukum Islam (7th ed.). Prenadamedia Group.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 1974 (1975).
Putusan Nomor 3107/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Badg (2025).
Putusan Nomor 3144/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Badg (2025).
Rahardjo, S. (2008). Hukum Progresif Berhadapan dengan Kemapanan. Jurnal Hukum Progresif.
RI, K. A., Islam, D. J. B. M., & Sakinah, D. B. K. dan K. (2018). Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia.
Septiandani, D., Triwati, A., & Yulistyowati, E. (2023). Kemaslahatan dalam Perkawinan Poligami Dalam Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif Indonesia. IUS Constituendum.
Siregar, D. S. (2022). Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara Izin Poligami (Studi Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Wonosari). https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/56467/
Sukmawan, Y. A., & Damayanti, D. (2025). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris sebagai Strategi Penguatan Perspektif Kajian Ilmu Hukum. Notary Law.
Susanti, D. I. (2021). Penafsiran Hukum Teori dan Metode. Sinar Grafika. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=6eY_EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=teori+penafsiran+hukum+adalah&ots=SnupkwhjIM&sig=Flu9e77wll7t14t8vVziLyiTmQs&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Undang-Undang RI Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan (1974).
Zahra, R., Qodri, M. A., & Syelvita, R. (2024). Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Terhadap Izin Poligami Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum (Studi Putusan Nomor 692/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Plh Dan Nomor 0007/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Lpk). Recital Review, 6(0007), 272–290. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/RR/article/view/48020/21970
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Elfiana Fitri Wardani, Lena Ishelmiany Ziaharah, Riyan Ramdani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
