TRANSFORMASI KONSEPTUAL MASYARAKAT KONTEMPORER: DIALEKTIKA NEOMODERNISME DAN POSTMODERNISME TERHADAP RASIONALITAS DAN EMANSIPASI SOSIAL DI ERA DIGITAL

Authors

  • Aisyah Nur Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
  • Devina Novela Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
  • Rahma Dona Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
  • Mei Arina Ilmi AS Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padang Sidimpuan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46773/djce.v4i1.2106

Abstract

This study aims to philosophically examine the crisis of rationality and the challenges of social emancipation in the digital society through a dialectical approach between neomodernism and postmodernism. Against the backdrop of the growing dominance of instrumental rationality in digital ecosystems which marginalizes ethical, reflective, and participatory dimensions this study explores two major schools of contemporary social philosophy. Neomodernism, through Jürgen Habermas' theory of communicative rationality, emphasizes rational discourse and consensus as the basis for a just social order. In contrast, postmodernism, as represented by Michel Foucault and Jean-François Lyotard, rejects universalist claims and deconstructs the role of power in the production of truth and representation. Employing a qualitative-philosophical method and philosophical discourse analysis, this research engages with primary texts from key thinkers as well as secondary literature on algorithmic technology, digital democracy, and global structural inequalities. The findings reveal that while normative neomodernist and postmodern deconstructive approaches are each insightful, neither alone is sufficient to address the complexity of contemporary crises. Accordingly, the study proposes a dialectical synthesis: a model of dialogical-pluralistic emancipation that integrates communicative ethics with the recognition of narrative particularity to form a more reflective, contextual, and transformative mode of social critique.

References

Abdulla, A. and Faraj, M. (2024). A profound irrationalism anchored in postmodernism: a study of harold pinter's the birthday party. JLS, 8(2), 270-284. https://doi.org/10.25130/lang.8.2.13

Abdullah, N. and Chaudhry, A. (2018). Promoting social justice and equity through university education in pakistan. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2018.120205

Afshari, P., Bayazidi, S., & Yazdani, S. (2023). Meta-synthesis as an original method to synthesize qualitative literature in chronic diseases: a narrative review. Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5812/jjcdc-139621

Aidnik, M. and Jacobsen, M. (2019). The u-turn of utopia – utopia, socialism and modernity in zygmunt bauman’s social thought. Irish Journal of Sociology, 27(1), 22-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0791603519825827

Averina, K. and Hlebova, N. (2022). Value-motivational aspects social activity development at the higher education institution specialists. Postmodern Openings, 13(1 Sup1), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1sup1/413

Bilić, P. (2018). A critique of the political economy of algorithms: a brief history of google’s technological rationality. Triplec Communication Capitalism & Critique Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 16(1), 315-331. https://doi.org/10.31269/vol16iss1pp315-331

Bowden, B. (2018). Work, wealth, and postmodernism.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76180-0

Castillo, J. and Pueyo, R. (2023). Sex on camera: a postmodern feminist critique on pornography. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 49(3), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v49i31132

Cern, K. (2019). How reflective and critical norm-usage paves the way to the public power of judgement. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale De Sémiotique Juridique, 33(1), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-019-09671-y

Drisko, J. (2019). Qualitative research synthesis: an appreciative and critical introduction. Qualitative Social Work, 19(4), 736-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325019848808

Evans, C., Abelson, J., Kates, N., Cavanagh, A., & Lavis, J. (2023). A multilevel framework for complex care: a critical interpretive synthesis. Health & Social Care in the Community, 2023, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4487200

Fenton, J. (2021). The “undeserving” narrative in child and family social work and how it is perpetuated by “progressive neoliberalism”: ideas for social work education. Societies, 11(4), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11040123

Foucault, M. (1980). "Power/Knowledge"; Lyotard, J.F. (1979). "The Postmodern Condition"

Grishaeva, E. and Busygin, A. (2023). ‘do i pray when listening to a recorded prayer?’: approval and critique of digital practices in the russian orthodox church. Convergence the International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 30(5), 1797-1812. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231216940

Habermas, J. (1984). "The Theory of Communicative Action"

Harvey, V. (2023). The student voice in employability within tertiary business and management education., 80-98. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529791082.n7

Heyssse, T. (2023). Power and normativity: rainer forst on noumenal power. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 50(8), 1175-1193. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537221150460

Hjelholt, M. (2024). The absorbent digital welfare state: silencing dissent, steering progress. Journal of Sociology, 60(3), 643-659. https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833241253632

Honneth, A. (2018). The other of justice: habermas and the ethical challenge of postmodernism., 133-167. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315251288-5

Levin, L. (2019). Rethinking social justice: a contemporary challenge for social good. Research on Social Work Practice, 30(2), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731519854161

Limenih, G. and Nouvet, É. (2024). The uptake of critical perspectives in the field of global mental health: a critical interpretive synthesis.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.10.24301044

Lynch, C. (2019). Contesting digital futures: urban politics, alternative economies, and the movement for technological sovereignty in barcelona. Antipode, 52(3), 660-680. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12522

Magis, C. (2018). Manual labour, intellectual labour and digital (academic) labour. the practice/theory debate in the digital humanities. Triplec Communication Capitalism & Critique Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 16(1), 159-175. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v16i1.847

Merawi, F. (2023). Limits of demythologization, critique of ideology, postmodern critique of reason and critique of the other: unsuccessful moments in the history of modern rationality. E-Logos, 30(2), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.e-logos.500

Muhamba, D. and Francis, B. (2023). Deconstructing reality: a postmodern analysis of the concept of truth. Journal of African Politics, 3(2), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.58548/2023jap32.3142

O’Byrne, D. (2020). A contribution to building unified movements for the environment: aligning interests, forming alliances. Human Geography, 13(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942778620927391

Orchard, A., Sitoh, J., Wyatt, A., & Moore, M. (2023). Music in medical education: a critical interpretive synthesis. Medical Education, 58(5), 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15255

Pillay, T. and Pillay, M. (2021). The power struggle: exploring the reality of clinical reasoning. Health an Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine, 27(4), 559-587. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593211054008

Place, K. and Ciszek, E. (2021). Troubling dialogue and digital media: a subaltern critique. Social Media + Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984449

Ratcliffe, J., Galdas, P., & Kanaan, M. (2020). Men and loneliness in the ‘west’: a critical interpretive synthesis.. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-17584/v1

Scheel, S. (2024). Epistemic domination by data extraction: questioning the use of biometrics and mobile phone data analysis in asylum procedures. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(9), 2289-2308. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2024.2307782

Sevim, E., Yildirim, Y., Ünsal, E., Dalmızrak, E., & Güntekin, B. (2025). Distinctive delta and theta responses in deductive and probabilistic reasoning. Brain and Behavior, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70179

Shaw, J. and Donia, J. (2021). The sociotechnical ethics of digital health: a critique and extension of approaches from bioethics. Frontiers in Digital Health, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.725088

Shubin, S. and Sowgat, T. (2019). Contested experiences and potential justice at the limit of the law for poor urban children in bangladesh. Children S Geographies, 18(5), 516-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1630711

Taffel, S. (2021). Data and oil: metaphor, materiality and metabolic rifts. New Media & Society, 25(5), 980-998. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211017887

Talseth, A. and Gilje, F. (2018). Responses of persons at risk of suicide: a critical interpretive synthesis. Nursing Open, 5(4), 469-483. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.169

Vogelmann, F. (2021). One step forward, two steps back: idealism in critical theory. Constellations, 28(3), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12548

Ward, S. and Budarick, J. (2020). Adapting to the postmodern medical paradigm: how the daily telegraph used emotion and anecdote to legitimise vaccination. Media International Australia, 181(1), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x20975786

Xia, B. (2021). Rethinking digital labour: a renewed critique moving beyond the exploitation paradigm. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 32(3), 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/10353046211038396

Zeli, A. (2024). Postmodern international relations: postmodernism beyond social constructivism. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 04(08). https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/v04i8y2024-14

Zheng, M. and Guinote, A. (2022). Power triggers moral reasoning aligned with active goals and moral flexibility across contexts. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 64(3), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12888

Zuboff, S. (2019). "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism"; Harari, Y.N. (2016). "Homo Deus"

Downloads

Published

2025-03-28

Issue

Section

Articles