ISLAMISASI INTEGRASI INTERKONEKSI ILMU PENGETAHUAN DAN AGAMA ISLAM: MODEL KEILMUAN DI PERGURUAN TINGGI ISLAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46773/muaddib.v5i2.897Abstract
This article discusses the concept of a scientific philosophical framework built by Islamic universities that switched form from IAIN to UIN. The object of this research is to compare three Islamic universities that already have the concept of scientific building of Islam and science, namely, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, and UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. This research method uses descriptive qualitative by obtaining data from scientific literature and campus media sources as the object of research. The results of the study explain that the three UIN campuses in the study have similar scientific ontology sourced from al Quran and al Hadith, while in the epistemological aspect the scientific concept of UIN Malang is Islamization, the scientific concept of UIN Surabaya is integration and the scientific model of UIN Yogyakarta is Interconnection. And at the level of axiology, UIN Malang and UIN Surabaya form the character of ulul albab
References
A.A, N. (2021). Sistem Penerimaan Siswa Baru Berbasis Web Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Siswa Di Era Pandemi. Biormatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 100–109.
Abuddin Nata. (2005). Integrasi Ilmu Agama & Ilmu Umum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Amin Abdullah. (2010). Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi: Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif . Pustaka Pelajar.
Edi Ah Iyubenu. (2015). Berhala-Berhala Wacana, Gagasan Kontekstualisasi ‘Sakralitas Agama’ Secara Produktif-Kreatif. ircisod.
Fahmi, M. (2013). Tantangan Interkoneksi Sains Dan Agama Di IAIN Sunan Ampel. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 1(2), 330.
Firdaus, M. F., Surabaya, A., Abdul, M., Maulana, K., Islam, U., Sunan, N., Surabaya, A., Aris, M., Islam, U., Sunan, N., Surabaya, A., Towers, T., & Pendahuluan, A. (2022). Paradigma Keilmuan Twin Towers Uin Sunan. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC THOUGHT AND PHILOSOPHY, 1(1), 122–146.
Hidayah, U. (2017). MERETAS DIKOTOMI KEILMUAN DI PERGURUAN TINGGI ISLAM. MTIYAZ: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman, 1(2), 140–161.
Husniyatus Salamah Zainiyati. (2014). Desain Pengembangan Kurikulum Integratif. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Nadwa, 8(02), 295–312.
Khozin. (2016). Pengembangan Ilmu di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam. Kencana.
Kuntowijoyo. (2007). Islam sebagai Ilmu: Epistemologi, Metodologi, dan Etika. Tiara Wacana. Mirza.
Muaz, Natsir, N. F., & Haryanti, E. (2022). Paradigma Integrasi Ilmu Perspektif Pohon Ilmu Uin Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang Paradigm of Science Integration in the Perspective of Science Trees At Uin Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. Al-Afkar: Journal for Islamic Studies, 5(1), 302–319. https://al-afkar.com/index.php/Afkar_Journal/issue/view/4
Nasution, H. (1975). Pembaharuan Dalam Islam. Bulan Bintang.
Noza Aflisia, Anang Azharie Alie, and E. H. (2021). Critical Study of the Modern Science Epistemology,” Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Review (AJMRR). 2(1), 1–21.
Rahayu, Y. N. (2020). Program Linier (Teori Dan Aplikasi). Widina Bhakti Persada.
Raya, M. K. F. (2020). Model pengembangan keilmuan UIN Malang & UIN Jogjakarta. M. Khafid Fuad Raya, 5(3), 248–253.
Yamin, M., Natsir, N. F., & Haryanti, E. (2022). Jaring Laba-Laba , Interaksi-Interkoneksi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. 5(1938), 302–309.
Zuhairini. (1995). Filsafat Pendidikan Islam. Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ulil Hidayah, Tobroni, Faridi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
