MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INTEGRATIF AGAMA DAN SAINS UNTUK MEMBENTUK KARAKTER RELIGIUS SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR INTEGRAL KOTA PROBOLINGGO

Authors

  • Khoiriyah Institut Ahmad Dahlan Probolinggo
  • Benny Prasetiya Institut Ahmad Dahlan Probolinggo
  • Ahsan Hakim Institut Ahmad Dahlan Probolinggo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46773/1ypqqj02

Keywords:

Reading skills, Word connection game

Abstract

The separation between religion and science in primary school learning often leads students to perceive science merely as empirical knowledge, while religion is positioned as a normative doctrine detached from their learning experiences. This condition highlights the need for a learning model that integrates scientific literacy, religious reflection, and character formation within a unified pedagogical framework. This study aims to analyze the implementation of an Integrative Religion and Science Learning Model in shaping the religious character of students at an Integrated Primary School in Probolinggo City. The study employed a mixed-method approach with a sequential explanatory design. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires administered to fifth-grade students to examine the relationship between the implementation of the integrative learning model and students’ religious character. Qualitative data were obtained through classroom observations and interviews with teachers and students to explain the learning processes, contextual dynamics, and pedagogical meanings underlying the model. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression, and thematic analysis, and were subsequently integrated through a joint display. The findings indicate that the integrative religion and science learning model is implemented through the integration of learning objectives, science content and religious values, inquiry-reflective activities, and religious habituation within the school environment. The model contributes to the formation of students’ religious character through the strengthening of faith, worship practices, moral conduct, gratitude, responsibility, and social care. This study emphasizes that religious character formation cannot rely solely on verbal religious instruction but should be developed through science learning that is reflective, dialogical, and spiritually meaningful.

References

Ahmed, S. K. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, Article 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198

Billingsley, B., Abedin, M., & Nassaji, M. (2020). Primary school students’ perspectives on questions that bridge science and religion: Findings from a survey study in England. British Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3574

Billingsley, B., Taber, K. S., & Nassaji, M. (2021). Scientism, creationism or category error? A cross-age survey of secondary school students’ perceptions of the relationships between science and religion. The Curriculum Journal, 32(2), 334–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.83

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Chan, J., & Erduran, S. (2023). The impact of collaboration between science and religious education teachers on their understanding and views of argumentation. Research in Science Education, 53, 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10041-1

Davoodi, T., & Lombrozo, T. (2022a). Explaining the existential: Scientific and religious explanations play different functional roles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(7), 1543–1566. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001129

Erduran, S., Guilfoyle, L., Park, W., Chan, J., & Fancourt, N. (2019). Argumentation and interdisciplinarity: Reflections from the Oxford Argumentation in Religion and Science Project. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0006-9

Erduran, S., Guilfoyle, L., & Park, W. (2022). Science and religious education teachers’ views of argumentation and its teaching. Research in Science Education, 52, 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09966-2

Fancourt, N., & Guilfoyle, L. (2022). Interdisciplinary perspective-taking within argumentation: Students’ strategies across science and religious education. Journal of Religious Education, 70, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-021-00143-9

Fetters, M. D., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2019). A checklist of mixed methods elements in a submission for advancing the methodology of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819875832

Guetterman, T. C., Creswell, J. W., Deutsch, C., & Gallo, J. J. (2021). Visuals in joint displays to represent integration in mixed methods research. Methods in Psychology, 5, Article 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100080

Haviz, M., Helmita, Ervina, D., David, & Maris, I. M. (2024). Muslim Indonesian prospective biology teachers’ acceptance and typology of the theory of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 17, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-024-00206-z

Hirose, M., & Creswell, J. W. (2023). Applying core quality criteria of mixed methods research to an empirical study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221086346

Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher-student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact upon student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 462–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730

Kidwell, J. H. (2024). Personal knowledge: Teaching place-based religious ethics for a climate emergency. Journal of Moral Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2024.2362996

Kim, M. Y., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.003

Leicht, C., Sharp, C. A., LaBouff, J. P., Zarzeczna, N., & Elsdon-Baker, F. (2022). Content matters: Perceptions of the science-religion relationship. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 32(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2021.2003111

Downloads

Published

2024-01-30

Issue

Section

Articles