STUDI KITAB-KITAB KESAHIHAN MATAN HADIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46773/tp31md33Keywords:
Hadith Compilations, The Textual Content Of Hadith, Criteria For The Authenticity Of Hadith TextsAbstract
This study examines hadith compilations from the pre-Kutub al-Sittah period—such as Al-Muwaṭṭa’, Musnad al-Syāfi‘ī, and Musnad Aḥmad—to the six canonical collections of Kutub al-Sittah (Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Sunan Abī Dāwūd, Jāmi‘ al-Tirmiżī, Sunan al-Nasā’ī, and Sunan Ibn Mājah) in order to understand the systematic development of hadith text (matan) verification. Using a qualitative method and library research approach, the study reveals that classical scholars did not assess the sanad alone but also examined the matan based on its consistency with the Qur’an and mutawātir Sunnah, rational coherence, internal consistency, and historical context. The findings affirm that matan criticism constitutes an integral and enduring part of the scientific methodology of hadith studies. This research recommends strengthening the study of matan authenticity through an interdisciplinary approach that integrates historical, linguistic, and social dimensions, as well as reinforcing hadith studies curricula in Islamic educational institutions to enable future scholars to interpret hadith both textually and contextually while preserving the authenticity of the Prophet’s teachings
References
Aizul Bin Yaakob, M., & Bt Shamsudin, R. (2020). Ketokohan al-Daraqutni dalam Disiplin Ilmu Hadith. Journal of Contemporary Islamic Studies, 6(2), 165–179. https://journal.uitm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JCIS/article/view/8069
Akbari, M. F., Hudaya, H., & Munawwarah, H. (2025). Metode Kritik Matan Hadis Perspektif Ulama Hadis. Al-Falah: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman Dan Kemasyarakatan, 25(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.47732/alfalahjikk.v25i1.398
Alfaqih, A. H., ‘Aisy, D. R., & Arifin, A. (2024). Konsep Hadis Shahih Imam Muslim dan Relevansi di Era Kontemporer. Relinesia: Jurnal Kajian Agama Dan Multikulturalisme Indonesia, 3(5), 29–47. https://jurnal.anfa.co.id/index.php/relinesia/article/view/2481
Alfiyatul Azizah. (2019). Gradasi Kualitas Hadist dalam Kitab Al-Jami’ ( Studi Analisis atas Metodologi Imam Tirmidzi dalam Penulisan Hadist ). Imiyah Pesantren, 5(2), 707–714. https://jurnal.assalaam.or.id/index.php/jip/article/view/25
Ali Yasmanto, & Siti Rohmaturrosyidah Ratnawati. (2019). Studi Kritik Matan Hadis: Kajian Teoritis dan Aplikatif Untuk Menguji Kesahihan Matan Hadis. Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 2(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.32505/v2i2.1163
Amelia, R. (2022). Manhaj Al-Hakim Al-Naisaburi dalam Al-Mustadrak ‘ala Shahihain. SHAHIH (Jurnal Kewahyuan Islam), 5(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.51900/shh.v5i2.14780
Ananda, M. W., & Yolla, D. F. (2025). The Thought And Methodology Of Imam An-Nasa ’ i In Writing Sunan An-Nasa ’ i. Journal of Innovation in Research, Education and Culture (JIREC), 3(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55311/jirec.v3i1.327
Arsyad, A. W. (2019). Studi Terhadap Aspek Keunggulan Kitab Sahih Muslim Terhadap Shahih Bukhari. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 17(2), 312. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v17i2.2454
Arya, R. (2024). Komparasi Pemikiran Ibn Qayyim Al-Jauziyyah dan Salah Ad-Din Al-Ibdlibi Tentang Kritik Matan Hadis (pp. 2–3).
Azmi, M. (2020). Kajian Kitab Hadis (Metode Kesahihan Hadis Dalam Kitab al-Mustadrak ‘Ala al-Sahihaini). Al-Irfan: Jurnal of Al Qur’an and Tafsir, 01(01), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51700/irfani.v1i1.2
Badi’ah, S. (2015). Kritik Hadits di Kalangan Ilmuwan Hadits Era Klasik dan Ilmuwan Hadits Era Modern (Tokoh, Parameter dan Contohnya). Al-Dzikra, 9(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/al-dzikra.v9i1.1725
Barsihannor, B. (2018). Metodologi Penulisan Sunan Al-Turmuzi. Rihlah: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Kebudayaan, 5(2), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.24252/rihlah.v5i2.4165
Dzulraidi, D. H., & Jalil, A. A. (2025). The Science of Hadith Commentary in Practice: A Methodological Review of Sunan al-Nasai’s Major Exegetical Works. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(3), 967–979. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i3/25579
Falahiyah, & Rosyadi, S. (2021). Melacak Validitas Hadis Ḍa‘Īf dalam Pemikiran Imām Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal dan Imām Abū Dāwūd. Holistic Al-Hadis, 7(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.32678/holistic.v7i1.5287
Firdaus, M. T., & Suryadilaga, M. A. (2020). Integrasi Keilmuan Dalam Kritik Matan Hadis. TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 18(2), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v18i2.96
Harmuliani, N., & Putra, A. B. (2023). Kutubusittah dan Kutubutis’ah. Jurnal Dirosah Islamiyah, 5(2), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.17467/jdi.v5i2.3145
Hikmah, N., Pangestu, S. A., & Luthfia, N. (2023). Analisis Kriteria Kesahihan Matan dalam Hadis: Kajian Teori dan Metodologi. Journal of Hadith Studies, 6(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v6i2-02
Hudaya, H. (2016). Metodologi Kritik Matan Hadis Menurut Al-Adlabidari Teori ke Aplikasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin, 13(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.18592/jiu.v13i1.701
Jayadi, M. (2015). Perkembangan Literatur Hadis pada Masa Awal Islam. Khizanah Al-Hikmah : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, Dan Kearsipan, 3(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v3i1a6
Kaharuddin, K., & Sahid, A. (2018). Hadis Sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam: (Tinjauan Paham Inkar As-Sunnah, Syi’ah, Dan Orientalis). TAJDID: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Dan Kemanusiaan, 2(2), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.52266/tadjid.v2i2.174
Kurniasih, A., & Alif, M. (2018). Metode Kritik Matan Hadis. Holistic Al-Hadis, 4(2), 42. https://doi.org/10.32678/holistic.v4i2.3226
Marzuki, M. (2006). Kritik Terhadap Kitab Shahih Al-Bukhari dan Shahih Muslim. HUMANIKA, 6(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v6i1.3809
Mestika, Z. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Misbah, M. (2020). Studi Kitab Hadis. In Al-Muna.
Mohd Razak, N. M. A., & Nazri, M. A. (2024). Manhaj Kritik Matan Hadis Ibn Al-Qayyim: Kajian Terhadap Kitab Al-Manār Al-Munīf. Jurnal Pengajian Islam, 17(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.53840/jpi.v17i2.362
Muhsin, M. (2011). Metode Bukhari Dalam Al-Jami’ Al-Bukhari. Al-Fath, 05(02), 1–15. https://jurnal.uinbanten.ac.id/index.php/alfath/article/download/3257/2372
Munggaran, A. G. (2025). Metode Praktis Mengetahui ’Ilal al-Ḥadīṡ: Klasik Dan Kontemporer. Hadisuna: Jurnal Studi Hadis, 1(1), 15–27. https://jurnal.iaipigarut.ac.id/HJSIH/article/view/43
N, R. (2013). Mengenal Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 9(2), 174–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33477/thk.v9i2.83
Nadhiran, H. (2017). EPISTEMOLOGI KRITIK HADIS. Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama, 18(2), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.19109/jia.v18i2.2363
Nurcahaya, N. (2021). Kitab Shahih Bukhari (Kajian Tentang Identitas dan Relevansinya Dengan Fase Kodifikasi Hadis). Al-Fikru: Jurnal Ilmiah, 14(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.51672/alfikru.v14i2.34
Qomarullah, M. (2022). Metode Kritik Matan Hadis Dengan Pendekatan Alquran Dalam Kaidah Ilmu Naqd Al-Matan. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 6(3), 1427–1450. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4041
Qomarullah, M., Juriono, J., & Amin, M. (2024). STUDY OF THE BOOK OF MUSNAD Al-SYAFI’I: Analysis of the Characteristics and Originality of Hadith which Rely on It. Riwayah : Jurnal Studi Hadis, 10(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.21043/riwayah.v10i2.26140
Rasjiddin, S. (2015). Metodologi Kritik Matan Dalam Ktab Al-Maudhu’at Karya ibn al-Jauzi. Mediasi, 9(2), 17–27.
Rosyad, S., & Alif, M. (2023). Hadis di Era Digital: Tantangan dan Peluang Penggunaan Teknologi dalam Studi Hadis. Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama, 24(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.19109/jia.v24i2.18979
Sahputra, H. (2022). Pemikiran Kritik Sanad Hadis. SHAHIH (Jurnal Kewahyuan Islam), 5(1), 2003–2005. https://doi.org/10.51900/shh.v5i1.12606
Santalia, I. (2015). Al-Muwatha Malik dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pemikiran Hadis. Tahdis: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Hadis2, 6(2), 43–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/tahdis.v6i2.7179
Sudianto, A. (2017). Metodologi Penulisan Musnad Ahmad ibn Ḥanbal. Jurnal As-Salam, 1(1), 7–17. https://jurnal-assalam.org/index.php/JAS/article/view/71
Suryadinata, M. (2020). Kritik Matan Hadis : Klasik Hingga Kontemporer. Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 2(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.15408/ushuluna.v2i2.15183
Syam, N. F., & Nurwandri, A. (2024). The Role of Kutub As-Sittah in Verifying the Authenticity of Hadith: A Takhrij Science Approach. Jurnal Penelitian Medan Agama, 15(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.58836/jpma.v15i1.20849
Taufik, A. (2021). Pendekatan Historiografi dalam Studi Hadist. Jurnal Al Irfani Ilmu Al Qur an Dan Tafsir, 2(2), 70–93. https://doi.org/10.51700/irfani.v2i2.315
Ulama’i, H. A., Muhtarom, M., & Mundhir, M. (2022). Epistemology of Hadith: Orientation for Chapters Compilation in the Kutub Sittah. Jurnal Theologia, 33(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2022.33.2.14418
Usman Ali, S. A., Perdana Rayyn, I. G. B. A., & S Puyu, D. (2023). Sunan Ibn Majah: An Overview. Ihyaussunnah : Journal of Ulumul Hadith and Living Sunnah, 2(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.24252/ihyaussunnah.v2i2.33806
Wandi, & Dadah. (2024). Analisis Kritis Terhadap Al-Hakim Al-Naisaburi ( Konteks Sosial dan Historis ). Tammat Journal of Critical Hadith Studies, 2(2), 1–11. https://ejournal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/tammat/article/view/1660
Yusran. (2017). Kodifikasi Hadis Sejak Masa Awal Islam hingga Terbitnya Kitab Al-Muwattha’. Tahdis, 8(2), 172–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/tahdis.v8i2.7227
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Syafe'i, Alma'arif, Taufik, Suheryeni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
