Digital Islamic Economy: Rekonstruksi Paradigma Bisnis Digital Berbasis Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah

Authors

  • Trisna Trihapsari
  • Fitri Dian Wilujeng
  • M. Faizal Anshori

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46773/c9ssae89

Keywords:

Digital Islamic Economy, Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, Digital Business, Islamic Business Ethics, Digital Governance

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the digital economy has transformed business models, market structures, and value creation mechanisms, yet it has also intensified concerns regarding economic inequality, algorithmic discrimination, data privacy, and ethical governance. This study aims to reconstruct the digital business paradigm through the integration of Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, emphasizing justice, inclusivity, sustainability, and human well-being. Employing a qualitative conceptual approach, the study adopts a systematic literature review and conceptual synthesis framework to examine contemporary digital business models, Islamic economic principles, and digital governance mechanisms. The conceptual synthesis identifies three major insights. First, conventional digital business paradigms prioritize efficiency, profitability, and technological innovation while insufficiently addressing distributive justice and stakeholder protection. Second, the five essential objectives of Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah provide a normative foundation for integrating ethical principles into digital economic activities. Third, the study proposes the Maqashid-Based Digital Business Governance framework, comprising three interconnected components: Sharia-oriented values, digital governance mechanisms, and socioeconomic well-being. Its operational dimensions encompass algorithmic transparency, data protection, transactional fairness, economic inclusion, and platform accountability. The proposed framework contributes theoretically by bridging Islamic economic thought with contemporary digital business governance and offers practical guidance for developing ethical, inclusive, and sustainable digital ecosystems. As the framework remains conceptual, further empirical validation is required to assess its applicability and effectiveness across different digital business sectors and institutional contexts.

 

References

Ahmed, H. (2024). Security tokens, ecosystems and financial inclusion: Islamic perspectives. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 17(4), 730–745. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-04-2024-0195

Bashori, Y. A., Umami, K., & Wahid, S. H. (2024). Maqasid Shariah-based digital economy model: Integration, sustainability and transformation. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(2), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no2.647

Chen, Q., Wang, Y., Gong, Y., & Liu, S. (2023). Ripping off regular consumers? The antecedents and consequences of consumers’ perceptions of e-commerce platforms’ digital power abuse. Journal of Business Research, 166, Article 114123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114123

Hanisch, M., Goldsby, C. M., Fabian, N. E., & Oehmichen, J. (2023). Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 162, Article 113777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113777

Jia, Y., Su, J., Cui, L., Wu, L., & Tan, K. H. (2023). Platform business model innovation in the digitalization era: A “driver-process-result” perspective. Journal of Business Research, 160, Article 113818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113818

Li, C., Li, H., & Tao, C. (2023). Evolutionary game of platform enterprises, government and consumers in the context of digital economy. Journal of Business Research, 167, Article 113858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113858

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Paul, J., Khatri, P., & Duggal, H. K. (2024). Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, why and how? Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197700

Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), O1–O16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695

Schreiber, F., & Cramer, C. (2024). Towards a conceptual systematic review: Proposing a methodological framework. Educational Review, 76(6), 1458–1479. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2116561

Sen, A., Kumar, A., Dubey, V., & Gupta, A. (2023). Managing two-sided B2B electronic markets: Governance mechanisms, performance implications, and boundary conditions. Journal of Business Research, 169, Article 114257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114257

Xie, X., Han, Y., Anderson, A., & Ribeiro-Navarrete, S. (2022). Digital platforms and SMEs’ business model innovation: Exploring the mediating mechanisms of capability reconfiguration. International Journal of Information Management, 65, Article 102513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102513

Veile, J. W., Schmidt, M.-C., & Voigt, K.-I. (2022). Toward a new era of cooperation: How industrial digital platforms transform business models in Industry 4.0. Journal of Business Research, 143, 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.062

Downloads

Published

2024-03-20

Issue

Section

Articles