A DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-INFORMED LEARNING MODEL FOR IMPROVING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN ISLAMIC PRIMARY EDUCATION: EVIDENCE FROM MUHAMMADIYAH SCHOOL IN PROBOLINGGO

Authors

  • Dody Tisna Amijaya Institut Ahmad Dahlan Probolinggo
  • Firmansyah Institut Ahmad Dahlan Probolinggo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46773/0epzsd72

Keywords:

Developmental Psychology, Learning Model, Student Engagement, Islamic Primary Education, Muhammadiyah School

Abstract

Student engagement in Islamic primary education requires learning approaches that are responsive to children’s cognitive, emotional, social, and moral development. This study aims to develop and examine a Developmentally Responsive Learning Model for enhancing student engagement in Islamic primary schools by integrating developmental psychology principles with Islamic educational practices. Employing a qualitative case study design, this research was conducted at MI Muhammadiyah Kota Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis involving ten educational practitioners, including school leaders and teachers. Data were analysed using thematic analysis to identify patterns related to developmental adaptation, teacher–student interaction, learning engagement, and pedagogical transformation. The findings reveal that the proposed model consists of four interconnected dimensions: developmental-based instructional adaptation, meaningful teacher–student relationships, multidimensional student engagement, and the transformation of teachers’ pedagogical roles. The model demonstrates that students’ engagement increases when learning activities are aligned with their developmental characteristics and supported by emotionally responsive classroom environments. Furthermore, the integration of Islamic educational values strengthens students’ moral, social, and spiritual engagement in learning processes. This study contributes theoretically by extending developmental psychology-based pedagogy within Islamic education and provides practical implications for designing inclusive, meaningful, and culturally responsive learning environments in Islamic primary schools.

References

Anyichie, A. C., & Butler, D. L. (2023). Examining culturally diverse learners’ motivation and engagement processes as situated in the context of a complex task. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1041946. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1041946

Ardi, M., Kusmaedi, N., Juliantine, T., & Budiana, D. (2025). Game learning model through Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP) approach to increase elementary school students’ learning motivation. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 58(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v58i1.90874

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Celine, D. R., Soraya, I., & Kurjum, M. (2024). Improving Islamic Religious Education learning through sort and paste worksheets and Think-Pair-Share strategy. Medina-Te: Jurnal Studi Islam, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.19109/medinate.v21i1.28067

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). I’m here for the hard re-set: Post pandemic pedagogy to preserve our culture. Equity & Excellence in Education, 54(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2020.1863883

Li, T., Wang, Z., Merrin, G. J., Wan, S., Bi, K., Quintero, M., & Song, S. (2024). The joint operations of teacher–student and peer relationships on classroom engagement among low-achieving elementary students: A longitudinal multilevel study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 77, 102258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102258

Novarizka, S., Na’imah, T., Dwiyanti, R., Noveni, N. A., Satata, D. B. M., & Şen, A. (2024). Self-regulated learning and academic stress of Islamic school students: Mediating effect of student engagement. International Journal of Islamic Educational Psychology, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/ijiep.v5i2.23643

Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2021). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 203–238. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321998407

Sari, G., & Silitonga, B. N. (2024). Gambaran pembelajaran berbasis Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP) di sekolah dasar. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 9(1), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i1.849

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2022). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection in the classroom. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.2005564

Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated instruction in secondary education: A systematic review of research evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

Issue

Section

Articles